Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘dovepress’ Category

C-section study retracted for being a twin

with 3 comments

doveA group of surgeons in Cairo, Egypt have retracted their 2012 paper in the International Journal of Women’s Health for plagiarism, although that’s not quite what they’re calling it.

Here’s the notice: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by amarcus41

January 30, 2013 at 11:00 am

Journal retracts nanoparticle paper, citing widespread misuse of sources

with 16 comments

The  International Journal of Nanomedicine is retracting a paper it published in June that appears to contain an impressive amount of misappropriated text and figures.

The article, “Particokinetics: computational analysis of the superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles deposition process,” came from a group at the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, in São Paulo, Brazil, led by Walter Cárdenas. According to the notice: Read the rest of this entry »

Journal pulls four breast cancer papers for duplication

with 8 comments

The journal Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, a Dove Medical Press title, has retracted four articles from a group of Indian researchers over what it said were “unacceptable levels” of duplication with other published work. (Such a construction leaves us wondering what might constitute “acceptable levels” of duplication, but that’s for a different post.)

The articles were submitted by Rajeev Singhai, who is listed as being with Grant Medical College and the Sir J J Group of Hospitals, in Mumbai. According to his After College page, Singhai received his PhD in 2011 and is now a research fellow.

As the notice states: Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,187 other followers