Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘environmental pollution’ Category

Radioactive fish study retracted for “significant and extensive” corrections

with 2 comments

The authors of a study estimating how much radioactive material from two sunken Russian submarines is taken up by fish in the Barents Sea have retracted it, citing the need for “significant and extensive” corrections.

Here’s the notice, from Environmental Pollution: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

October 16, 2012 at 11:54 am

Spanish veterinary researcher under suspicion of creating “ghost” author, fabricating data

with 9 comments

via Wikimedia

The Spanish press has picked up on the story of a prominent veterinary scientist in that country who has been accused of research misconduct.

According to El Pais, the researcher, Jesús Ángel Lemus, whose areas of interest include the effects of toxins on birds, ran into trouble in December when colleagues complained to the Ethics Committee of the Higher Council for Scientific Research about the reproducibility of his results and other problems. That triggered an inquiry by the CSIC into Lemus’ body of work, an investigation that, evidently, could not find a body.

Per El Pais (courtesy of Google Translate): Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,147 other followers