Publisher wants $650 to retract duplicated study » am j eng app sci
Retraction Watch
Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
Pages
- About Adam Marcus
- About Ivan Oransky
- The Retraction Watch FAQ, including comments policy
- The Retraction Watch Store
- The Retraction Watch Transparency Index
- Upcoming Retraction Watch appearances
- What people are saying about Retraction Watch
Recent Comments
 | Jaime A. Teixeira da… on How does a paper get published… |
 | Stewart on Half of researchers have repor… |
| Stewart on Half of researchers have repor… |
Retraction posts by author, country, journal, subject, and type
Follow Ivan on Twitter
- Scientists join journal editors to fight impact-factor abuse: @Richvn in @NatureNews blogs.nature.com/news/2013/05/s… 1 day ago
- Job: UK site @TheDrum seeks freelance NYC media reporter bit.ly/YPjAzr 1 day ago
- Oh good, the scientist who sued the Nobel because he didn't win is now suing the people who did bit.ly/17AAB5n 1 day ago
Follow Adam on Twitter
- Locusts may hold key to a better understanding of the blood-brain barrier: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671124 4 days ago
- Dahlberg: only 10% of allegations last year came from NIH work. 1 week ago
- ORI's John Dahlberg: misconduct allegations up sharply in recent years. 422 in 2012; 131 in Q1 2013. 1 week ago
