Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

A different tack: A “notice of redundant publication,” rather than a retraction, for duplication » bjog

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Reporters: How to use social media to find 'real people' for your stories, not just experts: @LizSzabo via @ahcj_pia bit.ly/14JjMS1 5 hours ago
Three years after FDA rejects @boehringer's "female Viagra" fibanserin, results published: bit.ly/ZiT9V7 8 hours ago
"Blue-Balled Monkeys Among Top 10 New Species" bit.ly/18bEqyi via @laermer 8 hours ago

Locusts may hold key to a better understanding of the blood-brain barrier: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671124 1 week ago
Dahlberg: only 10% of allegations last year came from NIH work. 2 weeks ago
ORI's John Dahlberg: misconduct allegations up sharply in recent years. 422 in 2012; 131 in Q1 2013. 2 weeks ago