Serbian scientists decry systematic plagiarism, predatory publishing » serbia
Retraction Watch
Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
Pages
- About Adam Marcus
- About Ivan Oransky
- The Retraction Watch FAQ, including comments policy
- The Retraction Watch Store
- The Retraction Watch Transparency Index
- Upcoming Retraction Watch appearances
- What people are saying about Retraction Watch
Recent Comments
 | Paul Brookes on Cell reviewing allegations of… |
 | Junk Science on Cell reviewing allegations of… |
 | 90 Shilling on Come see Retraction Watch in C… |
Retraction posts by author, country, journal, subject, and type
Follow Ivan on Twitter
- In @NatureNews, C. Glenn Begley's six red flags to identify preclinical papers in which data won't stand up bit.ly/1a7E2NK 1 hour ago
- An embargo flash card, courtesy @genentech via @brianreid bit.ly/16PJGb6 Now why didn't I think of that? 1 hour ago
- RT @NatureNews: Pure hype of pure research helps no one dlvr.it/3Ppn4Q 2 hours ago
Follow Adam on Twitter
- Locusts may hold key to a better understanding of the blood-brain barrier: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671124 1 week ago
- Dahlberg: only 10% of allegations last year came from NIH work. 2 weeks ago
- ORI's John Dahlberg: misconduct allegations up sharply in recent years. 422 in 2012; 131 in Q1 2013. 2 weeks ago
