Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Serial plagiarists earn lifetime publishing ban from Saudi journal » saudimedicine

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Arguments here also apply to scientific retractions: Al Jazeera deletes controversial Op-Ed, then refuses to comment m.guardiannews.com/commentisfree/… 1 hour ago
Could fear of getting caught reduce scientific misconduct? @LizzieGibney reports bit.ly/19wHCk8 3 hours ago
“Ephemeral nature” of samples — and co-author — leads to ninth Jesús Lemus retraction bit.ly/10jpoSG 5 hours ago

Locusts may hold key to a better understanding of the blood-brain barrier: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671124 6 days ago
Dahlberg: only 10% of allegations last year came from NIH work. 1 week ago
ORI's John Dahlberg: misconduct allegations up sharply in recent years. 422 in 2012; 131 in Q1 2013. 1 week ago