“This publication should be ignored”: Authorship issues, flawed data fell neuro-oncology paper » Neon 2009 regular volume.indd
Retraction Watch
Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
Pages
- About Adam Marcus
- About Ivan Oransky
- The Retraction Watch FAQ, including comments policy
- The Retraction Watch Store
- The Retraction Watch Transparency Index
- Upcoming Retraction Watch appearances
- What people are saying about Retraction Watch
Recent Comments
 | Malljaja on Cell attributes image problems… |
 | Rosie on Cell attributes image problems… |
 | Raffaele on Cell attributes image problems… |
Retraction posts by author, country, journal, subject, and type
Follow Ivan on Twitter
- Big scandals grab headlines, but journalists can do more to expose misconduct, says @fahydeclan in @CJR bit.ly/11fPabU 5 hours ago
- RT @AHCJ_Pia: Congrats to @richardkipling1 who will lead the CHCF Center for Health Reporting as editor-in-chief bit.ly/ZgPW8v 6 hours ago
- "Ivan is an easygoing gorilla...He rarely misses his life in the jungle." amzn.to/ZgROOy via @dontgetcaught 7 hours ago
Follow Adam on Twitter
- Locusts may hold key to a better understanding of the blood-brain barrier: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23671124 1 week ago
- Dahlberg: only 10% of allegations last year came from NIH work. 2 weeks ago
- ORI's John Dahlberg: misconduct allegations up sharply in recent years. 422 in 2012; 131 in Q1 2013. 2 weeks ago
