<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going Dutch: Stapel inquiry eyes credulous colleagues, institution, prompts national soul search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/</link>
	<description>Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.Chen</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-53776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I.Chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-53776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, but maybe this could (partly) be due to having received a very very poor education (also see Levelt report on some of the statistical analyses which are/were apparently common). If Stapel has to pay back funding, perhaps the universities should pay back students&#039; tuition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, but maybe this could (partly) be due to having received a very very poor education (also see Levelt report on some of the statistical analyses which are/were apparently common). If Stapel has to pay back funding, perhaps the universities should pay back students&#8217; tuition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimR.</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-36560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JimR.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-36560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commentary by FT columnist Simon Kuper on how bad his life has become. He is socially snubbed throughout the Netherlands.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/d1e53488-48cd-11e2-a6b3-00144feab49a.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commentary by FT columnist Simon Kuper on how bad his life has become. He is socially snubbed throughout the Netherlands.<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/d1e53488-48cd-11e2-a6b3-00144feab49a.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/d1e53488-48cd-11e2-a6b3-00144feab49a.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Lynch</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-33033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Lynch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-33033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Already happened: Marc Hauser used to be a star in the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already happened: Marc Hauser used to be a star in the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kovari</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Kovari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the contrary.  Everyone needs to find a way to make a living.  It&#039;s just that in Stapel&#039;s case, science isn&#039;t the way.  Maybe writing is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary.  Everyone needs to find a way to make a living.  It&#8217;s just that in Stapel&#8217;s case, science isn&#8217;t the way.  Maybe writing is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hibby</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hibby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had said the same about the book by Leonardo Gomes et al. (UNESP), also figuring in this blog because the book was retracted while by Springer and then re-edited and published in Brazil....
Must be a funny read to some and a dangerous textbook to many.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had said the same about the book by Leonardo Gomes et al. (UNESP), also figuring in this blog because the book was retracted while by Springer and then re-edited and published in Brazil&#8230;.<br />
Must be a funny read to some and a dangerous textbook to many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puzzled monkey</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[puzzled monkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just waiting (with bated breath) for something like this to happen in the USA: three or four or five top researchers are found to be fraudsters, like Dipak Das, etc.  It&#039;s only a matter of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just waiting (with bated breath) for something like this to happen in the USA: three or four or five top researchers are found to be fraudsters, like Dipak Das, etc.  It&#8217;s only a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf Zwaan</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rolf Zwaan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you both for setting this straight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both for setting this straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivanoransky</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivanoransky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Replaced &quot;initiate&quot; with &quot;lead&quot; -- thanks for pointing this out, Rolf, and for the suggestion, André.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replaced &#8220;initiate&#8221; with &#8220;lead&#8221; &#8212; thanks for pointing this out, Rolf, and for the suggestion, André.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André van Delft (@AndreVanDelft)</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[André van Delft (@AndreVanDelft)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A google-translate problem indeed; EM-online is correct. The Dutch verb &quot;leiden&quot; should here have been translated into &quot;lead&quot; rather than &quot;initiate&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A google-translate problem indeed; EM-online is correct. The Dutch verb &#8220;leiden&#8221; should here have been translated into &#8220;lead&#8221; rather than &#8220;initiate&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf Zwaan</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/going-dutch-stapel-inquiry-eyes-credulous-colleagues-institution-prompts-national-soul-search/#comment-32902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rolf Zwaan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10895#comment-32902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe this is a google-translate problem, but it is definitely not correct that &quot;Rolf Zwaan decided not to initiate further research..&quot;  This statement ought to be retracted. Here is why. First of all, it is up to the Board of Directors (well above my pay grade) to decide whether follow-up research should be initiated. Second, I have strongly recommended (which is all I could do) that follow-up research be initiated. Third, such research will start soon. It is true that I have decided to step down as chairman because I want to focus on my own research. Given how time-consuming this work is, it is not something that a mid-career scientist such as myself can afford to be involved in for a long time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is a google-translate problem, but it is definitely not correct that &#8220;Rolf Zwaan decided not to initiate further research..&#8221;  This statement ought to be retracted. Here is why. First of all, it is up to the Board of Directors (well above my pay grade) to decide whether follow-up research should be initiated. Second, I have strongly recommended (which is all I could do) that follow-up research be initiated. Third, such research will start soon. It is true that I have decided to step down as chairman because I want to focus on my own research. Given how time-consuming this work is, it is not something that a mid-career scientist such as myself can afford to be involved in for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
