<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surgery journal issues Expression of Concern when institution can&#8217;t confirm case study details &#8220;for legal reasons&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/surgery-journal-issues-expression-of-concern-when-institution-cant-confirm-case-study-details-for-legal-reasons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/surgery-journal-issues-expression-of-concern-when-institution-cant-confirm-case-study-details-for-legal-reasons/</link>
	<description>Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 08:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mico Tatalovic</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/surgery-journal-issues-expression-of-concern-when-institution-cant-confirm-case-study-details-for-legal-reasons/#comment-30822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mico Tatalovic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10313#comment-30822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[any updates yet? seems strange to cite legal reasons for not confirming the accuracy of a case, no?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any updates yet? seems strange to cite legal reasons for not confirming the accuracy of a case, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip_MoMo (@Chip_Molly)</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/surgery-journal-issues-expression-of-concern-when-institution-cant-confirm-case-study-details-for-legal-reasons/#comment-29009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chip_MoMo (@Chip_Molly)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=10313#comment-29009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder on what grounds the reader questioned the validity of a case devoid of patient identifiers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder on what grounds the reader questioned the validity of a case devoid of patient identifiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
