<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flawed disclosure leads dental journal to retract disinfection paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/flawed-disclosure-leads-dental-journal-to-retract-disinfection-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/flawed-disclosure-leads-dental-journal-to-retract-disinfection-paper/</link>
	<description>Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chirality</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/flawed-disclosure-leads-dental-journal-to-retract-disinfection-paper/#comment-22814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chirality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=9533#comment-22814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very convoluted story told in a way too many words when truth is usually very simple. So, what is the bottom line? Some guy was promoting a certain product because he had 90,000 reasons to do it? Was the editor approached by the manufactures of the alternative products and &quot;convinced&quot; to retract?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very convoluted story told in a way too many words when truth is usually very simple. So, what is the bottom line? Some guy was promoting a certain product because he had 90,000 reasons to do it? Was the editor approached by the manufactures of the alternative products and &#8220;convinced&#8221; to retract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
