<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faked data, unsubstantiated claims, and spirituality add up to a math journal retraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/</link>
	<description>Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirui</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-3863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 04:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-3863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you prevent a reader from making his own intelligent conclution about the article and think for people?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you prevent a reader from making his own intelligent conclution about the article and think for people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-2629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I call sokal-style-hoax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call sokal-style-hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Bogomolny</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Bogomolny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-2293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M. Sivasubramanian, of Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India has written at least three more papers - in two other journals - that merit a retraction. See

http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/2010/10/a-computer-application-in-mathematics/

and references therein.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M. Sivasubramanian, of Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India has written at least three more papers &#8211; in two other journals &#8211; that merit a retraction. See</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/2010/10/a-computer-application-in-mathematics/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/2010/10/a-computer-application-in-mathematics/</a></p>
<p>and references therein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Joachim</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell Joachim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-2009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Clearly this is not an architecture journal. Peer review?  Who needs it!
Funny blog -- I&#039;m a new covert. 

PS hi Ben and hi Ivan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Clearly this is not an architecture journal. Peer review?  Who needs it!<br />
Funny blog &#8212; I&#8217;m a new covert. </p>
<p>PS hi Ben and hi Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegt</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-1957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AML has recently retracted another paper, this one from a creationist: G. Sewell, &quot;A second look at the second law,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.019&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;doi:10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.019&lt;/a&gt;. The author has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.math.utep.edu/Faculty/sewell/articles/AML_3497.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;copy&lt;/a&gt; at his web site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AML has recently retracted another paper, this one from a creationist: G. Sewell, &#8220;A second look at the second law,&#8221; <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.019" rel="nofollow">doi:10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.019</a>. The author has a <a href="http://www.math.utep.edu/Faculty/sewell/articles/AML_3497.pdf" rel="nofollow">copy</a> at his web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivanoransky</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-1956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivanoransky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-1956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed it is. We&#039;ve fixed that in the text, thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is. We&#8217;ve fixed that in the text, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessika</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-1955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree, as does my boyfriend that&#039;s a mathematician! Well, he has some more chosen words but that&#039;s for another time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, as does my boyfriend that&#8217;s a mathematician! Well, he has some more chosen words but that&#8217;s for another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob O'H</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob O'H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-1954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh duh, I hadn&#039;t connected the dots. This is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2011/02/a-journal-impos.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;second retraction by the journal this year. (HT: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=14;t=6300;st=10770#entry184727&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sparc&lt;/a&gt;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh duh, I hadn&#8217;t connected the dots. This is the <a href="http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2011/02/a-journal-impos.html" rel="nofollow">second retraction by the journal this year. (HT: </a><a href="http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=14;t=6300;st=10770#entry184727" rel="nofollow">Sparc</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roshan</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roshan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-1953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s probably Pollachi, &lt;em&gt;Tamil Nadu&lt;/em&gt;, India.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s probably Pollachi, <em>Tamil Nadu</em>, India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: svenkatr</title>
		<link>http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/faked-data-unsubstantiated-claims-and-spirituality-add-up-to-a-math-journal-retraction/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[svenkatr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 03:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/?p=2055#comment-1952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Since Lingham means (among other things) ‘phallus’ and Maha means ‘big’

Actually, the name Mahalingam is not uncommon in South India. As far as traditional Indian names go, it is religious in origin (and doesn&#039;t have anything to do a phallus).

Just thought I&#039;d add that. The guy seems to be a typical crank. I can&#039;t believe the abstract of the plenary. It really is a crying shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Since Lingham means (among other things) ‘phallus’ and Maha means ‘big’</p>
<p>Actually, the name Mahalingam is not uncommon in South India. As far as traditional Indian names go, it is religious in origin (and doesn&#8217;t have anything to do a phallus).</p>
<p>Just thought I&#8217;d add that. The guy seems to be a typical crank. I can&#8217;t believe the abstract of the plenary. It really is a crying shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
